Smart EPD
Carbon Steel Slab

Environmental Product Declaration

Carbon Steel Slab

by JSW Steel USA

Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) for Carbon Steel Slab, manufactured by JSW Steel USA. Declaration SmartEPD-2026-149-1013-01, prepared according to Smart EPD® Part B PCR for Designated Steel Construction Products, 1000-008, v3.0, valid until August 13, 2031.

Download the EPD (PDF)

Declared unit
1 metric ton of product
Valid until
August 13, 2031
PCR
Part B PCR for Steel Construction Products

Declaration details

Manufacturer
JSW Steel USA
Program operator
Smart EPD
Declaration number
SmartEPD-2026-149-1013-01
Date of issue
August 13, 2026
Valid until
August 13, 2031
Product category rules (PCR)
Smart EPD® Part B PCR for Designated Steel Construction Products, 1000-008, v3.0 (version 3)
Standard
ISO 14025:2006 and ISO 21930:2017
Declared unit
1 metric ton of product
System boundary
Cradle to gate (A1 - A3)
Product specificity
Product Specific
Manufacturing specificity
Facility Specific
Manufacturing plant
JSW Steel (USA) Inc. (1500 Commercial Ave, Mingo Junction, OH 43938, USA)
Product category
Steel › StructuralSteel
Product SKU
Carbon Steel Slab Yield Tensile Strength: 235-636 MPa
Verifier
Vijay Thakur, Individual Verifier
LCA software
SimaPro 10.2
Program instructions
Smart EPD General Program Instructions v.2.0, March 2025

Life cycle assessment results

Results per 1 metric ton of product.

Environmental Impact Assessment Results

IndicatorUnitA1A2A3Total
GWP-totalkg CO2 eq4.56e+24.58e+12.52e+27.53e+2
GWP-fossilkg CO2 eq4.55e+24.58e+12.52e+27.52e+2
GWP-biogenickg CO2 eq4.84e-106.73e-25.52e-1
GWP-luluckg CO2 eq6.11e-102.15e-26.32e-1
ODPkg CFC 11 eq4.87e-61.35e-71.65e-66.66e-6
APkg SO2 eq2.03e+05.64e-18.15e-13.41e+0
EPkg N eq2.42e-11.01e-18.16e-24.25e-1
SFPkg O3 eq2.72e+11.25e+18.98e+04.87e+1

Resource Use Indicators

IndicatorUnitA1A2A3Total
RPREMJ5.55e+23.38e-31.34e+26.89e+2
RPRMMJ0000.00e+0
RPRTMJ5.55e+23.38e-31.34e+26.89e+2
NRPREMJ6.10e+31.68e+14.52e+31.06e+4
NRPRMMJ1.03e+3001.03e+3
NRPRTMJ7.13e+31.68e+14.52e+31.17e+4
SMkg9.75e+2009.75e+2
RSFMJ0000.00e+0
NRSFMJ0000.00e+0
REMJ0000.00e+0
ADP-fossilMJ6.38e+31.56e+12.80e+39.20e+3
FWm34.18e+04.95e-28.70e-15.10e+0

Waste and Output Flow Indicators

IndicatorUnitA1A2A3Total
HWDkg001.03e+11.03e+1
NHWDkg002.36e+12.36e+1
HLRWkg0000.00e+0
ILLRWkg0000.00e+0
CRUkg0000.00e+0
MRkg001.18e+11.18e+1
MERkg0000.00e+0
EEMJ0000.00e+0

Carbon Emissions and Removals

IndicatorUnitA1A2A3Total
BCRPkg CO20000.00e+0
BCEPkg CO20000.00e+0
BCRKkg CO200-1.97e+0-1.97e+0
BCEKkg CO2001.97e+01.97e+0

ND = not declared. Life cycle modules: A1-A3 product stage, A4-A5 construction process, B use stage, C end of life, D benefits and loads beyond the system boundary.

Material composition

Product composition
Material/Component CategoryOrigin% Mass
Carbon SteelUnited States100
Packaging
Packaging materialOriginMass (kg)
Wood DunnageUnited States1.08E+00
Biogenic carbon
Biogenic carbon contentkg C per metric ton
Biogenic carbon content in product0
Biogenic carbon content in accompanying packaging0.538

Hazardous substances

No regulated hazardous or dangerous substances are included in this product.

Product description

This EPD represents carbon steel slab produced via Electric Arc Furnace (EAF) technology at JSW USA facilities in the United States.

Environmental Product Declarations and product-level environmental data are available to support Buy America compliance documentation, Scope 2 reporting, Buy Clean requirements, LEED documentation, and ESG audit processes.

Interpretation

The contribution analysis indicates that the majority of the impacts occur because of raw materials (A1) and manufacturing (A3). An average of 69% (ranging from 56% - 97%) for A1 and an average of 21% (ranging from 3% - 33%) for A3 across all impact categories. Note that raw material transport in A2 accounts for an average of 10% (ranging from 0% - 26%) across all impact categories.

Note: A collection of manufacturer-average and/or facility-specific EPDs is insufficient for setting benchmarks and thresholds unless production volumes are taken into account. Benchmarking and threshold setting efforts shall also consider that some manufacturer-average data and facility-specific data may be represented in Industry-average EPDs and may result in double counting of the same data.

LCIA results are relative expressions and do not predict impacts on category endpoints, the exceeding of thresholds, safety margins or risks. EPDs are comparable only when they follow the same PCR, functional unit and system boundary. The full EPD (PDF) contains the methodology, scenario assumptions and verification statement.