Environmental Product Declaration
ProCut Hip & Ridge (Ardmore)
Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) for ProCut Hip & Ridge (Ardmore), manufactured by Atlas Roofing Corp.. Declaration SmartEPD-2026-108-0843-01, prepared according to UL Part B: Asphalt Shingles, Built-up Asphalt and Modified Bituminous Membrane Roofing, valid until April 20, 2031.
- Declared unit
- 1 m2 of product one (1) square meter of shingle product at a specific mass and thickness to be reported
- Valid until
- April 20, 2031
- PCR
- UL Part B: Asphalt Shingles, Built-up Asphalt and Modified Bituminous Membrane Roofing
Declaration details
- Manufacturer
- Atlas Roofing Corp.
- Program operator
- Smart EPD
- Declaration number
- SmartEPD-2026-108-0843-01
- Date of issue
- April 20, 2026
- Valid until
- April 20, 2031
- Product category rules (PCR)
- UL Part B: Asphalt Shingles, Built-up Asphalt and Modified Bituminous Membrane Roofing (version 3)
- Standard
- ISO 14025:2006 and ISO 21930:2017
- Declared unit
- 1 m2 of product one (1) square meter of shingle product at a specific mass and thickness to be reported
- System boundary
- Cradle to gate (A1 - A3)
- Product specificity
- Product Specific
- Manufacturing specificity
- Facility Specific
- Manufacturing plant
- Ardmore (2300 Veterans Blvd, Ardmore, OK 73401, USA)
- Product category
- ThermalMoistureProtection › MembraneRoofing › BituminousRoofing
- Product SKU
- ProCut Hip & Ridge
- Verifier
- Amy Landis, Michigan Technological University
- LCA software
- SimaPro 9.6
- Program instructions
- Smart EPD General Program Instructions v.2.0, March 2025
Life cycle assessment results
Results per 1 m2 of product one (1) square meter of shingle product at a specific mass and thickness to be reported.
Environmental Impact Assessment Results
| Indicator | Unit | A1 | A2 | A3 | A1-A3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GWP-total (IPCC) | kg CO2 eq | 9.66e-1 | 3.19e-1 | 4.94e-1 | 1.78e+0 |
| ODP | kg CFC 11 eq | 1.14e-8 | 5.36e-9 | 7.95e-9 | 2.47e-8 |
| AP | kg SO2 eq | 5.01e-3 | 1.53e-3 | 1.18e-3 | 7.72e-3 |
| EP | kg N eq | 2.29e-3 | 3.26e-4 | 1.88e-3 | 4.50e-3 |
| POCP | kg O3 eq | 6.57e-2 | 4.12e-2 | 1.96e-2 | 1.27e-1 |
| GWP-total (CML) | kg CO2 eq | 9.58e-1 | 3.18e-1 | 4.92e-1 | 1.77e+0 |
| ODP | kg CFC 11 eq | 9.43e-9 | 4.06e-9 | 6.02e-9 | 1.95e-8 |
| AP | kg SO2 eq | 4.93e-3 | 1.26e-3 | 9.48e-4 | 7.14e-3 |
| EP | kg PO4 eq | 1.64e-3 | 3.20e-4 | 8.51e-4 | 2.81e-3 |
| POCP | kg C2H4 eq | 5.78e-4 | 5.52e-5 | 7.04e-5 | 7.04e-4 |
| ADP-minerals&metals | kg Sb eq | 3.01e-5 | 9.58e-7 | 6.26e-7 | 3.17e-5 |
| ADP-fossil | MJ | 5.50e+1 | 4.43e+0 | 6.23e+0 | 6.57e+1 |
Resource Use Indicators
| Indicator | Unit | A1 | A2 | A3 | A1-A3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RPRE | MJ, LHV | 6.52e-1 | 6.51e-2 | 1.42e+0 | 2.14e+0 |
| RPRM | MJ, LHV | 0 | 0 | 1.22e+0 | 1.22e+0 |
| RPRT | MJ, LHV | 6.52e-1 | 6.51e-2 | 2.64e+0 | 3.36e+0 |
| NRPRE | MJ, LHV | 1.78e+1 | 4.78e+0 | 6.86e+0 | 2.94e+1 |
| NRPRM | MJ, LHV | 3.84e+1 | 0 | 2.59e-1 | 3.87e+1 |
| NRPRT | MJ, LHV | 5.61e+1 | 4.78e+0 | 7.12e+0 | 6.80e+1 |
| ADP-fossil | MJ, LHV | 5.56e+0 | 6.25e-1 | 8.72e-1 | 7.06e+0 |
| SM | kg | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| RSF | MJ, LHV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| NRSF | MJ, LHV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FW | m3 | 6.18e-3 | 6.79e-4 | 4.08e-4 | 7.27e-3 |
| RE | MJ, LHV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Waste and Output Flow Indicators
| Indicator | Unit | A1 | A2 | A3 | A1-A3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HWD | kg | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| NHWD | kg | 0 | 0 | 2.46e-1 | 2.46e-1 |
| HLRW | kg | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ILLRW | kg | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| CRU | kg | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MFR | kg | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MER | kg | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| EEE | MJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Carbon Emissions and Removals
| Indicator | Unit | A1 | A2 | A3 | A1-A3 | A5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCRK | kg CO2 | 0 | 0 | -1.41e-1 | -1.41e-1 | 3.80e-2 |
| BCEK | kg CO2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.03e-1 |
ND = not declared. Life cycle modules: A1-A3 product stage, A4-A5 construction process, B use stage, C end of life, D benefits and loads beyond the system boundary.
Material composition
| Material/Component Category | Origin | % Mass |
|---|---|---|
| Asphalt | 20 - 30 % | |
| Calcium Carbonate | 30 - 40 % | |
| Sand | < 10 % | |
| Mineral Granules | 30 - 40 % | |
| Fiberglass Mat | < 10 % |
| Packaging material | Origin | Mass (kg) |
|---|---|---|
| LDPE Film | 0.00666 | |
| Wooden pallet | 0.0771 |
| Biogenic carbon content | kg C per m2 |
|---|---|
| Biogenic carbon content in accompanying packaging | 0.0385 |
Hazardous substances
No regulated hazardous or dangerous substances are included in this product.
Product description
Pro-Cut® Hip & Ridge shingles featuring Scotchgard™ Protector help resist black streaks caused by algae, while providing a finish designer look at the hip and ridge.
Interpretation
The contribution analysis indicates that the raw materials module (A1) is the biggest driver for all impact assessment indicators (50-75%) with the largest contributors being raw asphalt flux and various asphalt-based adhesives. Fiberglass mats are also significant contributors while mineral-based materials (granules, limestone, and sand) are not major impact sources. Additionally, each transport to the manufacturing location (A2) and manufacturing (A3) are responsible for approximately 5% to 30% of all impact categories.
The contribution diagram includes the LCIA impact categories shown in the Impact Assessment Results table: the first five are the North American impact indicators from TRACI 2.1 version 1.06, followed by the European indicators from CML-baseline, version 4.2. GWP refers to the 100 year global warming potential, is the first indicator for each set of results, and is labeled with the associated impact assessment method. ODP refers to ozone depletion potential, EP is eutophication potential, AP is acidification potential, POCP is photochemical oxidant creation potential and ADP refers to abiotic depletion potential (for either fossil or non-fossil resources, as labeled).
LCIA results are relative expressions and do not predict impacts on category endpoints, the exceeding of thresholds, safety margins or risks. EPDs are comparable only when they follow the same PCR, functional unit and system boundary. The full EPD (PDF) contains the methodology, scenario assumptions and verification statement.