Smart EPD
Stonproof CT5

Environmental Product Declaration

Stonproof CT5

by Stonhard

Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) for Stonproof CT5, manufactured by Stonhard. Declaration SmartEPD-2026-123-0791-01.1, prepared according to EPD International PCR for Construction Products 2019:14 (EN 15804:A2:2019/AC:2021) v2.0.1, valid until March 23, 2031.

Download the EPD (PDF)

Declared unit
1 kg of product of resinous floor coating
Valid until
March 23, 2031
PCR
EPD International PCR for Construction Products 2019:14 (EN 15804:A2:2019/AC:2021) v1.3.4

Declaration details

Manufacturer
Stonhard
Program operator
Smart EPD
Declaration number
SmartEPD-2026-123-0791-01.1
Date of issue
March 23, 2026
Valid until
March 23, 2031
Product category rules (PCR)
EPD International PCR for Construction Products 2019:14 (EN 15804:A2:2019/AC:2021) v2.0.1 (version 2.0.1)
Standard
ISO 14025:2006 and EN 15804+A2:2019/AC:2021
Declared unit
1 kg of product of resinous floor coating
System boundary
Cradle to gate with other options (A1 - A3, A4, A5, C1 - C4, D)
Product specificity
Product Specific
Manufacturing specificity
Facility Specific
Manufacturing plant
Alghero, Italy (Alghero, Italy)
Product category
Finishes › Flooring › OtherFlooring
Product service life
5 years
Verifier
Amy Landis, Michigan Technological University
LCA software
SimaPro 10.2
Program instructions
Smart EPD General Program Instructions v.2.0, March 2025

Life cycle assessment results

Results per 1 kg of product of resinous floor coating.

Environmental Impact Assessment Results

IndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5C1C2C3C4D
GWP-totalkg CO2 eq4.80e+01.90e-11.40e-106.70e-402.90e-3-6.20e-2
GWP-biogenickg CO2 eq-2.50e-14.40e-51.20e-302.20e-704.80e-73.50e-2
GWP-fossilkg CO2 eq5.00e+01.90e-11.40e-106.70e-402.90e-3-9.70e-2
GWP-luluckg CO2 eq6.70e-28.80e-51.30e-303.00e-703.20e-7-2.00e-4
ODPkg CFC11 eq1.80e-72.60e-93.70e-909.00e-1204.10e-11-6.60e-10
APmol H+ eq2.20e-21.80e-35.00e-402.30e-602.50e-5-7.80e-4
EP-freshwaterkg P eq1.40e-31.70e-52.80e-507.20e-801.40e-7-3.40e-5
EP-marinekg N eq5.20e-34.90e-41.20e-407.50e-701.10e-5-1.20e-4
EP-terrestrialmol N eq4.70e-25.40e-31.10e-308.10e-601.20e-4-1.30e-3
POCPkg NMVOC eq2.20e-21.70e-34.90e-403.30e-603.80e-5-3.80e-4
ADP-minerals&metalskg Sb eq3.50e-54.50e-77.00e-701.80e-901.10e-9-7.90e-7
ADP-fossilMJ9.80e+12.60e+02.00e+009.50e-303.70e-2-1.00e+0
WDPm3 depriv.1.70e+01.20e-23.50e-205.00e-508.20e-5-3.50e-2

Resource Use Indicators

IndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5C1C2C3C4D
PEREMJ8.40e+03.20e-21.70e-101.30e-403.10e-4-4.60e-1
PERMMJ3.30e-106.70e-300000
PERTMJ6.60e+01.50e-21.30e-106.00e-501.70e-4-3.90e-1
PENREMJ9.80e+12.60e+02.00e+009.50e-303.70e-2-1.00e+0
PENRMMJ00000000
PENRTMJ9.40e+12.60e+01.90e+009.40e-303.70e-2-9.50e-1
SMkg00000008.70e-3

Waste and Output Flow Indicators

IndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5C1C2C3C4D
HWDkg00000000
NHWDkg3.20e-201.50e-10001.00e+00
RWDkg7.60e-55.00e-71.50e-602.00e-904.20e-9-9.20e-7
CRUkg00000000
MFRkg3.00e-204.10e-200000
MERkg00000000
EEMJ00000000

Carbon Emissions and Removals

IndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5C1C2C3C4D
Bio Carbon Removal from Productkg CO200000000
Bio Carbon Emission from Productkg CO200000000
Bio Carbon Removal from Packagingkg CO2-4.42e-20000000
Bio Carbon Emission from Packagingkg CO2004.42e-200000
Bio Carbon Emission from Waste during Manufacturing (renewable source)kg CO200000000
Calcination Carbon Removalkg CO200000000
Carbonation Carbon Emissionkg CO200000000
Carbon Emission from Waste during Manufacturing (non-renewable source)kg CO200000000

ND = not declared. Life cycle modules: A1-A3 product stage, A4-A5 construction process, B use stage, C end of life, D benefits and loads beyond the system boundary.

Material composition

Product composition
Material/Component CategoryOrigin% Mass
Additive< 10
Curing agent12 - 19
Epoxy resin46 - 69
Pigment11 - 16
Plasticizer< 10
Rehoelogy modifier< 10
Wetting agent< 10
Packaging
Packaging materialOriginMass (kg)
Aluminium foil0.01
Cardboard0.03
Plastic ldpe0.03
Supersack0.1
Biogenic carbon
Biogenic carbon contentkg C per kg
Biogenic carbon content in product0
Biogenic carbon content in accompanying packaging0.01

Hazardous substances

4-tert-Butylphenol (98-54-4)

benzene-1,3-dimethanamine (1477-55-0)

2,2,4-trimethylhexane-1,6-diamine (25513-64-8)

N-(3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl)ethylenediamine (1760-24-3)

n,n'-bis[3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl]ethylenediamine (68845-16-9)

n,n-bis[3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl]-1,2-ethanediamine (74956-86-8)

Reaction product: bisphenol-A-(epichlorhydrin) epoxy resin (number average molecular weight $\le 700$) (25068-38-6)

Polypropyleneglycol-epichlorohydrin copolymer (9072-62-2)

2,3-epoxypropyl o-tolyl ether (2210-79-9)

titanium dioxide (13463-67-7)

bis[4-(2,3-epoxypropoxy)phenyl]propane (1675-54-3)

oxydipropyl dibenzoate (27138-31-4)

Solvent naphtha (petroleum), light arom. (64742-95-6)

Scenarios

Transport to the building site (A4)

Fuel type
Diesel
Vehicle type
Truck and Trailer
Transport distance
1442 km
Capacity utilization
33%
Weight of products transported
1.17 kg
Packaging mass
0.17 kg

End of life (C1-C4)

Collected with mixed construction waste
1 kg
Landfill
1 kg

Product description

Stonproof CT5 is a two-component, flexibie, epoxy membrane designed exclusively for use in the isolation of dynamic cracks. Stonproof CT5 is compatible with most floor systems and exhibits excellent adhesion and hardness to handle heavy traffic areas.

Interpretation

Raw materials are sourced from suppliers, transported to manufacturing facilities, and mixed to produce products. The product stage (A1-A3) has the highest environmental impact, especially due to raw material production and energy use. End-of-life impacts are relatively low, as products are assumed to be landfilled with building demolition waste. However, this stage (modules C1-C4) should be considered when using the results of the product stage (modules A1-A3). The manufacturer should explore lower-impact raw materials and work with suppliers using sustainable methods to enhance product sustainability.

LCIA results are relative expressions and do not predict impacts on category endpoints, the exceeding of thresholds, safety margins or risks. EPDs are comparable only when they follow the same PCR, functional unit and system boundary. The full EPD (PDF) contains the methodology, scenario assumptions and verification statement.