Smart EPD
Standard Won-Door FireGuard™ Door

Environmental Product Declaration

Standard Won-Door FireGuard™ Door

by Won-Door

Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) for Standard Won-Door FireGuard™ Door, manufactured by Won-Door. Declaration SmartEPD-2026-133-0867-01.1, prepared according to UL Part B: Commercial Steel Doors and Steel Frames, valid until May 18, 2031.

Download the EPD (PDF)

Declared unit
1 commercial steel door, nominal dimensions of 3-feet x 7-feet considered in isolation of product
Valid until
May 18, 2031
PCR
Commercial Steel Doors and Steel Frames

Declaration details

Manufacturer
Won-Door
Program operator
Smart EPD
Declaration number
SmartEPD-2026-133-0867-01.1
Date of issue
May 18, 2026
Valid until
May 18, 2031
Product category rules (PCR)
UL Part B: Commercial Steel Doors and Steel Frames (version 3)
Standard
ISO 14025:2006
Declared unit
1 commercial steel door, nominal dimensions of 3-feet x 7-feet considered in isolation of product
System boundary
Cradle to gate with other options (A1 - A3, A4, A5, C2 - C4)
Product specificity
Product Specific
Manufacturing specificity
Facility Specific
Manufacturing plant
WON-DOOR (1865 South 3480 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84104, USA)
Product SKU
Standard Won-Door FireGuard™ Door
Product service life
30 years
Verifier
Amy Landis, Michigan Technological University
LCA software
SimaPro 10.2
Program instructions
Smart EPD General Program Instructions v.2.0, March 2025

Life cycle assessment results

Results per 1 commercial steel door, nominal dimensions of 3-feet x 7-feet considered in isolation of product.

Environmental Impact Assessment Results

IndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5C2C3C4
GWP-totalkg CO2 eq1.52e+23.71e+04.84e-29.80e-22.51e+01.16e-1
GWP-fossilkg CO2 eq1.52e+23.70e+04.84e-29.79e-22.51e+01.15e-1
GWP-biogenickg CO2 eq2.81e-17.60e-46.41e-62.01e-51.50e-44.08e-5
GWP-luluckg CO2 eq2.42e-11.27e-38.82e-73.37e-51.96e-56.53e-4
ODPkg CFC-11 eq1.55e-65.91e-83.98e-111.56e-98.30e-101.01e-9
APkg SO2 eq7.56e-17.65e-32.29e-52.02e-45.37e-45.32e-4
SFPkg O3 eq8.99e+01.47e-16.59e-43.89e-31.60e-21.23e-2
EP-freshwaterkg P eq7.35e-21.38e-41.15e-63.64e-62.31e-51.70e-5
EP-marinekg N eq8.17e-21.27e-36.09e-63.36e-51.48e-41.07e-4
ADP-fossilMJ1.65e+35.62e+12.10e-21.49e+04.60e-11.31e+0

Resource Use Indicators

IndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5C2C3C4
RPREMJ3.87e+26.43e-18.21e-41.70e-21.85e-22.70e-1
RPRMMJ9.42e+000000
RPRTMJ3.97e+26.43e-18.21e-41.70e-21.85e-22.70e-1
NRPREMJ1.65e+35.62e+12.10e-21.49e+04.60e-11.31e+0
NRPRMMJ000000
NRPRTMJ1.65e+35.62e+12.10e-21.49e+04.60e-11.31e+0
SMkg000000
RSFMJ000000
NRSFMJ000000
REMJ000000
FWm35.44e+12.39e-13.17e-3000

Waste and Output Flow Indicators

IndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5C2C3C4
HWDkg000003.97e-1
NHWDkg8.18e-204.91e-3001.09e+1
HLLRWkg000000
ILLRWkg000000
CRUkg000000
MRkg1.62e-105.07e-101.43e+10
MERkg2.98e-106.97e-201.06e+00
EEMJ8.63e+001.40e+003.25e+10

Carbon Emissions and Removals

Results use AR5
IndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5C2C3C4
Bio Carbon Removal from Productkg CO2000000
Bio Carbon Emission from Productkg CO2000000
Bio Carbon Removal from Packagingkg CO2-1.25e+000000
Bio Carbon Emission from Packagingkg CO23.01e-109.48e-1000
Bio Carbon Emission from Waste during Manufacturing (renewable source)kg CO2000000
Calcination Carbon Removalkg CO2000000
Carbonation Carbon Emissionkg CO2000000
Carbon Emission from Waste during Manufacturing (non-renewable source)kg CO2000000

ND = not declared. Life cycle modules: A1-A3 product stage, A4-A5 construction process, B use stage, C end of life, D benefits and loads beyond the system boundary.

Material composition

Product composition
Material/Component CategoryOrigin% Mass
Drive and electricalUS5.12
FastenersUS4.31
Hardware and movementUS16.7
Sealing and insulationUS1.36
Structure and frameUS72.5
Packaging
Packaging materialOriginMass (kg)
Cardboard0.560
Plastic ldpe0.0200
Biogenic carbon
Biogenic carbon contentkg C per commercial steel door, nominal dimensions of 3-feet x 7-feet considered in isolation
Biogenic carbon content in product0
Biogenic carbon content in accompanying packaging0.26

Hazardous substances

Lead acid battery

Scenarios

Transport to the building site (A4)

Fuel type
Diesel
Vehicle type
Truck and Trailer
Transport distance
1540 km
Capacity utilization
33.0%
Weight of products transported
27.2 kg
Packaging mass
0.582 kg

End of life (C1-C4)

Collected with mixed construction waste
26.6 kg
Recycling
14.3 kg
Landfill
11.3 kg
Incineration
1.06 kg

Product description

The Won-Door FireGuard™ is a versatile fire-rated accordion folding door designed to provide secure solutions for various architectural openings, including narrow corridors, short ceilings, and large spans up to 200 feet wide and 30 feet tall. It serves as a fire-protected opening in egress paths, is ADA compliant, and offers fire ratings ranging from 20 to 180 minutes. The doors feature smoke and draft seals, curved track options, and customizable designs to match adjacent finishes. They are engineered to meet regulatory standards such as IBC, NFPA, and UL, ensuring safety and reliability. Additional options include key switch controls, backlit exit hardware, infrared obstruction detectors, vision panels, and air pressure resistance levels. Made in the USA, these doors are ideal for applications requiring fire safety, security, and sound control.

Interpretation

The manufacturing of Won-Door products involves the direct procurement of raw materials and their subsequent processing at US-based facilities. The Product Stage (A1–A3) is the primary impact driver due to the energy required for raw material extraction and assembly. A limitation of this study is that upstream impacts are based on industry-average profiles rather than specific supplier data.

The 30-year Reference Service Life is contingent upon standard indoor use and adherence to the manufacturer's maintenance schedule. To modify the current environmental profile, evaluating a transition to renewable energy sources for manufacturing is suggested. Additionally, Won-Door should assess substituting raw material inputs with alternative options and prioritize collecting primary data from suppliers regarding their specific production techniques or energy mixes.

LCIA results are relative expressions and do not predict impacts on category endpoints, the exceeding of thresholds, safety margins or risks. EPDs are comparable only when they follow the same PCR, functional unit and system boundary. The full EPD (PDF) contains the methodology, scenario assumptions and verification statement.