Smart EPD
Medium Density SFRM (SK-3, Z-106/G, Z-106/HY, Z-3306, Z-3306 Gray, Z-3306 White)

Environmental Product Declaration

Medium Density SFRM (SK-3, Z-106/G, Z-106/HY, Z-3306, Z-3306 Gray, Z-3306 White)

by GCP/Saint-Gobain

Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) for Medium Density SFRM (SK-3, Z-106/G, Z-106/HY, Z-3306, Z-3306 Gray, Z-3306 White), manufactured by GCP/Saint-Gobain. Declaration SmartEPD-2026-153-1033-01, prepared according to Smart EPD® Part B PCR for Spray-Applied Fire-Resistive Materials, 1000-003, v4.0, valid until August 18, 2031.

Download the EPD (PDF)

Declared unit
1 metric ton of product
Valid until
August 18, 2031
PCR
Part B PCR for Spray-Applied Fire-Resistive Materials, 1000-003, v4.0

Declaration details

Manufacturer
GCP/Saint-Gobain
Program operator
Smart EPD
Declaration number
SmartEPD-2026-153-1033-01
Date of issue
August 18, 2026
Valid until
August 18, 2031
Product category rules (PCR)
Smart EPD® Part B PCR for Spray-Applied Fire-Resistive Materials, 1000-003, v4.0 (version 4.0)
Standard
ISO 14025:2006 and ISO 21930:2017
Declared unit
1 metric ton of product
System boundary
Cradle to gate with other options (A1 – A3, specify other options)
Product specificity
Product Average
Manufacturing specificity
Manufacturer Average
Manufacturing plants
Santa Ana (2500 South Garnsey Street, Santa Ana, CA, USA); Ajax (294 Clements Rd W, Ajax, ON, Canada)
Product category
Finishes
Verifier
Alison Lee, Independent Contractor
LCA software
Sphera LCA for Experts (formerly GaBi) 10.9
Program instructions
Smart EPD General Program Instructions v.2.0, March 2025

Life cycle assessment results

Results per 1 metric ton of product.

Environmental Impact Assessment Results

IndicatorUnitA1-A3
GWP-total (excl biogenic)kg CO2 eq4.23e+2
GWP-total (incl biogenic)kg CO2 eq3.98e+2
GWP-total (excl biogenic)kg CO2 eq4.20e+2
GWP-total (incl biogenic)kg CO2 eq3.95e+2
ODPkg CFC 11 eq1.56e-6
APkg SO2 eq1.19e+0
EP-freshwaterkg P eq1.30e-2
EP-marinekg N eq6.87e-1
POCPkg O3 eq2.50e+1
ADP-fossilMJ5.53e+2

Resource Use Indicators

IndicatorUnitA1-A3
RPREMJ9.93e+2
RPRMMJ0
RPRTMJ9.93e+2
NRPREMJ4.84e+3
NRPRMMJ0
NRPRTMJ4.84e+3
SMkg3.71e+1
RSFMJ0
NRSFMJ0
FWm31.02e+0

Waste and Output Flow Indicators

IndicatorUnitA1-A3
HWDkg5.34e-3
NHWDkg7.15e+1
HLRWkg5.76e-5
ILLRWkg7.84e-2
CRUkg0
MFRkg0
MERkg0
MNERkg0
EEEMJ0

Carbon Emissions and Removals

IndicatorUnitA1-A3
BCRPkg CO2-1.22e+1
BCEPkg CO20
BCRKkg CO2-1.30e+1
BCEKkg CO20

ND = not declared. Life cycle modules: A1-A3 product stage, A4-A5 construction process, B use stage, C end of life, D benefits and loads beyond the system boundary.

Material composition

Product composition
Material/Component CategoryOrigin% Mass
GypsumConfidential48-58
Portland Limestone CementConfidential25-35
Recovered paperConfidential4-6
Rest- additivesConfidential8-12
ClayConfidential2-5
LimestoneConfidential1-3
Packaging
Packaging materialOriginMass (kg)
PalletsConfidential6.92
Stretch FilmConfidential0.05
Paper SacksConfidential1.18
Biogenic carbon
Biogenic carbon contentkg C per metric ton
Biogenic carbon content in product3.31
Biogenic carbon content in accompanying packaging3.54

Hazardous substances

No substances required to be reported as hazardous are associated with the production of this product

Product description

Spray-Applied Fire-Resistive Materials (SFRM) (UN CPC 54650) are composed primarily of binding agents such as cement or gypsum and may incorporate supplementary materials including quartz, bauxite, and other additives. These additional components are used to reduce density and enhance insulating properties by introducing entrained air. Chemical hardeners may also be included to accelerate curing or to improve the mechanical strength of the final product.

Passive fire protection materials (commonly referred to as fireproofing) are designed to prevent or delay the structural failure of steel and concrete elements when exposed to fire. These materials function by insulating structural members, thereby slowing heat transfer and preserving structural integrity for a defined period. A variety of fireproofing materials are available depending on the application requirements. Applied fireproofing systems are typically available in both wet-mix and dry-mix formulations and are most commonly spray-applied, although trowel application is also used in certain cases.

SFRM products are generally supplied as dry powder in bags and mixed with water at the point of application. Modern formulations are asbestos-free and do not contain intentionally added free crystalline silica, aligning with current health and safety standards. This Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) specifically covers standard-density SFRM products.

This report serves as the basis for a company-specific EPD representing a range of SFRM products manufactured at three GCP Applied Technologies facilities in North America, produced in accordance with varying product specifications.

Interpretation

The cradle-to-gate production (A1–A3) of Medium density Spray Applied Fire-Resistive Materials (SFRM) requires approximately 4.8 GJ of total primary energy (LHV) and results in about 423 kg CO₂e per metric ton of product (GWP, excluding biogenic carbon, IPCC AR6).

Across the life cycle stages, Module A1 (raw material extraction and upstream processing) is the dominant contributor, accounting for roughly 92% of total GWP. This confirms that the environmental profile of SFRM is primarily driven by raw material production.

Module A2 (transportation) contributes approximately 8–9% (~32 kg CO₂e), driven by the transport of raw materials to the manufacturing facility. Transportation also plays a notable role in impact categories such as photochemical ozone creation potential (POCP).

Module A3 (manufacturing) contributes a relatively small share at ~9.2 kg CO₂e (~2–3%), associated with on-site energy use and operational processes.

The environmental profile of standard-density SFRM-Medium Density is overwhelmingly influenced by raw material production, with transportation as a secondary contributor, while manufacturing impacts remain relatively limited. This suggests that the greatest opportunities for impact reduction lie in raw material optimization and upstream supply chain improvements.

LCIA results are relative expressions and do not predict impacts on category endpoints, the exceeding of thresholds, safety margins or risks. EPDs are comparable only when they follow the same PCR, functional unit and system boundary. The full EPD (PDF) contains the methodology, scenario assumptions and verification statement.