Environmental Product Declaration
Commercial Automatic Sliding Systems
Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) for Commercial Automatic Sliding Systems, manufactured by Horton Automatics. Declaration SmartEPD-2026-136-0882-01, prepared according to Smart EPD® Part A Product Category Rules for Building and Construction Products and Services, 1000, v1.2, valid until June 1, 2031.
- Declared unit
- 1 m2 of product of door opening maintained and operated for 10 years
- Valid until
- June 1, 2031
- PCR
- Smart EPD® Part A Product Category Rules for Building and Construction Products and Services, 1000, v1.2
Declaration details
- Manufacturer
- Horton Automatics
- Program operator
- Smart EPD
- Declaration number
- SmartEPD-2026-136-0882-01
- Date of issue
- June 1, 2026
- Valid until
- June 1, 2031
- Product category rules (PCR)
- Smart EPD® Part A Product Category Rules for Building and Construction Products and Services, 1000, v1.2 (version 1.2)
- Standard
- ISO 14025:2006 and ISO 21930:2017
- Declared unit
- 1 m2 of product of door opening maintained and operated for 10 years
- System boundary
- Cradle to gate with other options (A1 - A3, A4, A5, B6, B7, C1 - C4)
- Product specificity
- Product Specific
- Manufacturing specificity
- Facility Specific
- Manufacturing plant
- Tamaulipas, México (Calle 1 1600, Chapultepec, Matamoros, Tamaulipas, México)
- Product category
- Openings
- Product SKU
- The Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) for the S2000B, S2003, S2001, S2003T and S2022 covers the the sling system's header, frame, accessories and doors. Reference products do not include glazing.
- Product service life
- 10 years
- Verifier
- Arka Pandit
- LCA software
- SimaPro 10.2
- Program instructions
- Smart EPD General Program Instructions v.2.0, March 2025
Life cycle assessment results
Results per 1 m2 of product of door opening maintained and operated for 10 years.
Environmental Impact Assessment Results
| Indicator | Unit | A1-A3 | A4 | A5 | B6 | B7 | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GWP-total | kg CO2 eq | 1.32e+3 | 7.62e+0 | 1.41e-2 | 3.66e+2 | 0 | 0 | 3.12e-1 | 0 | 2.35e-1 |
| GWP-fossil | kg CO2 eq | 1.30e+3 | 7.61e+0 | 1.40e-2 | 3.66e+2 | 0 | 0 | 3.12e-1 | 0 | 2.35e-1 |
| GWP-biogenic | kg CO2 eq | 1.34e+1 | 2.37e-3 | 2.58e-5 | 4.32e-2 | 0 | 0 | 7.30e-5 | 0 | 3.16e-5 |
| GWP-luluc | kg CO2 eq | 7.30e+0 | 4.11e-3 | 4.43e-6 | 3.17e-2 | 0 | 0 | 1.41e-4 | 0 | 2.56e-5 |
| ODP | kg CFC-11 eq | 4.17e-5 | 1.07e-7 | 1.99e-10 | 7.02e-6 | 0 | 0 | 4.44e-9 | 0 | 3.48e-9 |
| AP | kg SO2 eq | 9.68e+0 | 2.44e-2 | 9.91e-5 | 1.19e+0 | 0 | 0 | 9.77e-4 | 0 | 1.89e-3 |
| SFP | kg O3 eq | 1.01e+2 | 5.37e-1 | 2.76e-3 | 1.45e+1 | 0 | 0 | 2.18e-2 | 0 | 5.87e-2 |
| EP-freshwater | kg P eq | 6.61e-1 | 5.91e-4 | 5.15e-6 | 2.82e-2 | 0 | 0 | 2.22e-5 | 0 | 6.74e-6 |
| EP-marine | kg N eq | 9.82e-1 | 4.60e-3 | 2.53e-5 | 1.26e-1 | 0 | 0 | 1.87e-4 | 0 | 4.92e-4 |
Resource Use Indicators
| Indicator | Unit | A1-A3 | A4 | A5 | B6 | B7 | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RPRE | MJ | 1.76e+3 | 1.90e+0 | 3.70e-3 | 5.94e+2 | 0 | 0 | 5.97e-2 | 0 | 2.51e-2 |
| RPRM | MJ | 1.51e+2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| RPRT | MJ | 1.91e+3 | 1.90e+0 | 3.70e-3 | 5.94e+2 | 0 | 0 | 5.97e-2 | 0 | 2.51e-2 |
| NRPRE | MJ | 1.43e+4 | 1.07e+2 | 1.15e-1 | 5.09e+3 | 0 | 0 | 4.40e+0 | 0 | 2.97e+0 |
| NRPRM | MJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| NRPRT | MJ | 1.43e+4 | 1.07e+2 | 1.15e-1 | 5.09e+3 | 0 | 0 | 4.40e+0 | 0 | 2.97e+0 |
| SM | kg | 2.84e+1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| RSF | MJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| NRSF | MJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| RE | MJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ADP-fossil | MJ | 1.43e+4 | 1.07e+2 | 1.15e-1 | 5.09e+3 | 0 | 0 | 4.40e+0 | 0 | 2.97e+0 |
| FW | m3 | 2.81e+2 | 6.01e-1 | 1.18e-2 | 3.25e+1 | 0 | 0 | 2.34e-2 | 0 | 6.74e-3 |
Waste and Output Flow Indicators
| Indicator | Unit | A1-A3 | A4 | A5 | B6 | B7 | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HWD | kg | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| NHWD | kg | 8.68e+0 | 0 | 5.34e-1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.11e+1 |
| HLLRW | kg | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ILLRW | kg | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| CRU | kg | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MR | kg | 1.10e-1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.52e+0 | 0 |
| MER | kg | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| EE | MJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Carbon Emissions and Removals
| Indicator | Unit | A1-A3 | A4 | A5 | B6 | B7 | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bio Carbon Removal from Product | kg CO2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bio Carbon Emission from Product | kg CO2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bio Carbon Removal from Packaging | kg CO2 | -1.39e+1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bio Carbon Emission from Packaging | kg CO2 | 1.30e+1 | 0 | 9.19e-1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bio Carbon Emission from Waste during Manufacturing (renewable source) | kg CO2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Calcination Carbon Removal | kg CO2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Carbonation Carbon Emission | kg CO2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Carbon Emission from Waste during Manufacturing (non-renewable source) | kg CO2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
ND = not declared. Life cycle modules: A1-A3 product stage, A4-A5 construction process, B use stage, C end of life, D benefits and loads beyond the system boundary.
Material composition
| Material/Component Category | Origin | % Mass |
|---|---|---|
| Aluminum | CO | 62.61 |
| Fasteners | US | 0.17 |
| Motor and Electronics | CN, HK | 10.06 |
| Other metal parts | HK | 2.2 |
| Sealing and Gaskets | US, HK | 4.71 |
| Steel | BR | 20.25 |
| Packaging material | Origin | Mass (kg) |
|---|---|---|
| Cardboard | 0.04 | |
| Plastic LDPE | 0 | |
| Wood pallet | 0.02 |
| Biogenic carbon content | kg C per m2 |
|---|---|
| Biogenic carbon content in product | 0 |
| Biogenic carbon content in accompanying packaging | 0.03 |
Hazardous substances
Lubricating oil
Scenarios
Transport to the building site (A4)
- Fuel type
- Diesel
- Vehicle type
- Truck and Trailer
- Transport distance
- 838 km
- Capacity utilization
- 33%
- Weight of products transported
- 88.13 kg
- Packaging mass
- 0.5344 kg
End of life (C1-C4)
- Collected with mixed construction waste
- 87.6 kg
- Recycling
- 6.517 kg
- Landfill
- 81.08 kg
Product description
The Horton Commercial Automatic Sliding Door Systems are belt-drive, electromechanical sliding door solutions designed to provide reliable, quiet, and hands-free pedestrian access across a wide range of commercial and institutional applications, including retail, hospitality, healthcare, and educational facilities. Available in multiple configurations — including slim-profile (S2000B), standard heavy-duty (S2003), super-duty (S2001), telescoping (S2003T), and compact sliding (S2022) — these systems are engineered to handle varying door panel weights and traffic volumes, with options for non, partial, and full breakout configurations. Constructed with heavy-duty rails, solid metal carriage frames, and double astragal weather seals, they are built for long-term performance in high-traffic environments.
Interpretation
The manufacturing of the products analyzed in this EPD involves the direct procurement of raw materials from suppliers, transported to manufacturing facilities (A2) where they are processed and assembled into finished products (A1–A3). Results show that modules A1–A3 carry the highest impact contribution across most impact categories, driven by the environmental burdens associated with raw material extraction and processing. Operational energy use (B6) also represents a significant contributor over the declared 10-year reference service life.
Opportunities to reduce overall impact include exploring material sourcing strategies that lower the burden of A1–A3, such as engaging suppliers who employ sustainable manufacturing practices or integrate renewable energy into their production processes.
LCIA results are relative expressions and do not predict impacts on category endpoints, the exceeding of thresholds, safety margins or risks. EPDs are comparable only when they follow the same PCR, functional unit and system boundary. The full EPD (PDF) contains the methodology, scenario assumptions and verification statement.