Environmental Product Declaration
Rigid Aluminum Conduit (RAC) 1/2" to 6"
by Penn Aluminum International
Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) for Rigid Aluminum Conduit (RAC) 1/2" to 6", manufactured by Penn Aluminum International. Declaration SmartEPD-2025-083-0585-01, prepared according to Smart EPD® Part B PCR for Electrical and Telecommunications Conduit, 1000-001, v1.0, valid until September 11, 2030.
- Declared unit
- 1 m of product
- Valid until
- September 11, 2030
- PCR
- Part B PCR for Conduit and Conduit Accessories, 1000-003
Declaration details
- Manufacturer
- Penn Aluminum International
- Program operator
- Smart EPD
- Declaration number
- SmartEPD-2025-083-0585-01
- Date of issue
- September 11, 2025
- Valid until
- September 11, 2030
- Product category rules (PCR)
- Smart EPD® Part B PCR for Electrical and Telecommunications Conduit, 1000-001, v1.0 (version 1)
- Standard
- ISO 14025:2006 and ISO 21930:2017
- Declared unit
- 1 m of product
- System boundary
- Cradle to gate with other options (A1 - A3, C1 - C4, D)
- Product specificity
- Product Specific
- Manufacturing specificity
- Facility Specific
- Manufacturing plant
- Penn Aluminum (1117 N 2nd St, Murphysboro, IL 62966, USA)
- Product category
- Electrical › ElectricalConduit
- Product SKU
- P-100-10-RAC
- Verifier
- Salil Arora
- LCA software
- SimaPro 9.6
- Program instructions
- Smart EPD General Program Instructions v.2.0, March 2025
Life cycle assessment results
Results per 1 m of product.
Environmental Impact Assessment Results
| Indicator | Unit | A1-A3 | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GWP-total | kg CO2 eq | 5.97e+0 | ND | 2.56e-2 | 0 | 1.04e-3 | -4.68e-1 |
| GWP-total (excl biogenic) | kg CO2 eq | 5.97e+0 | ND | 2.56e-2 | 0 | 1.04e-3 | -4.72e-1 |
| GWP-total (incl biogenic) | kg CO2 eq | 5.97e+0 | ND | 2.56e-2 | 0 | 1.04e-3 | -4.68e-1 |
| ODP | kg CFC 11 eq | 9.40e-8 | ND | 3.90e-10 | 0 | 2.12e-11 | -4.72e-9 |
| AP | kg SO2 eq | 2.20e-2 | ND | 1.32e-4 | 0 | 7.71e-6 | -3.47e-3 |
| EP | kg N eq | 1.16e-2 | ND | 2.83e-5 | 0 | 2.74e-6 | -1.57e-3 |
| POCP | kg O3 eq | 2.40e-1 | ND | 3.72e-3 | 0 | 1.18e-4 | -3.05e-2 |
| HTP-c | CTUh | 4.37e-6 | ND | 6.77e-9 | 0 | 3.20e-10 | -7.82e-7 |
| HTP-nc | CTUh | 1.89e-6 | ND | 6.02e-9 | 0 | 3.31e-9 | -3.23e-7 |
| ETP-fw | CTUe | 9.10e+1 | ND | 2.61e-1 | 0 | 7.55e-2 | -1.54e+1 |
| PM | kg PM2.5 eq | 3.13e-3 | ND | 1.60e-5 | 0 | 8.73e-7 | -4.62e-4 |
Resource Use Indicators
| Indicator | Unit | A1-A3 | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PERE | MJ | 1.32e+1 | ND | 4.71e-3 | 0 | 5.18e-4 | -2.42e+0 |
| PERM | MJ | 4.08e-1 | ND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| PERT | MJ | 1.36e+1 | ND | 4.71e-3 | 0 | 5.18e-4 | -2.42e+0 |
| PENRE | MJ | 1.76e+1 | ND | 3.67e-2 | 0 | 3.26e-3 | -2.42e+0 |
| PENRM | MJ | 1.89e-1 | ND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| PENRT | MJ | 1.78e+1 | ND | 3.67e-2 | 0 | 3.26e-3 | -2.42e+0 |
| RPRE | MJ | 1.32e+1 | ND | 4.71e-3 | 0 | 5.18e-4 | -2.42e+0 |
| RPRM | MJ | 4.08e-1 | ND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| RPRT | MJ | 1.36e+1 | ND | 4.71e-3 | 0 | 5.18e-4 | -2.42e+0 |
| NRPRE | MJ | 1.76e+1 | ND | 3.67e-2 | 0 | 3.26e-3 | -2.42e+0 |
| NRPRM | MJ | 1.89e-1 | ND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| NRPRT | MJ | 1.78e+1 | ND | 3.67e-2 | 0 | 3.26e-3 | -2.42e+0 |
| ADP-fossil | MJ | 1.25e-1 | ND | 2.77e-4 | 0 | 2.28e-5 | -1.88e-2 |
| SM | kg | 7.49e-1 | ND | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1.44e-1 |
| RSF | MJ | 0 | ND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| NRSF | MJ | 0 | ND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FW | m3 | 2.14e-2 | ND | 1.22e-5 | 0 | -3.93e-5 | -3.88e-3 |
| RE | MJ | 0 | ND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Waste and Output Flow Indicators
| Indicator | Unit | A1-A3 | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HWD | kg | 0 | ND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| NHWD | kg | 0 | ND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| RWD | kg | 0 | ND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| HLRW | kg | 0 | ND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ILLRW | kg | 0 | ND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| CRU | kg | 0 | ND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MFR | kg | 3.24e-1 | ND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.40e-3 |
| MER | kg | 0 | ND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MNER | kg | 0 | ND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| EEE | MJ | 0 | ND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| EET | MJ | 0 | ND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Carbon Emissions and Removals
| Indicator | Unit | A1-A3 | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCRP | kg CO2 | 0 | ND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| BCEP | kg CO2 | 0 | ND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| BCRK | kg CO2 | 1.97e-2 | ND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.27e-2 |
| BCEK | kg CO2 | 0 | ND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.55e-3 |
| BCEW | kg CO2 | 0 | ND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| CCE | kg CO2 | 0 | ND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| CCR | kg CO2 | 0 | ND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| CWNR | kg CO2 | 0 | ND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
ND = not declared. Life cycle modules: A1-A3 product stage, A4-A5 construction process, B use stage, C end of life, D benefits and loads beyond the system boundary.
Material composition
| Material/Component Category | Origin | % Mass |
|---|---|---|
| Aluminim Alloy 6061 | USA | 0.7 |
| Aluminum Alloy 6063 | USA | 99.3 |
| Packaging material | Origin | Mass (kg) |
|---|---|---|
| Wood | USA | 0.011 |
| Plastic Banding | USA | 0.0021 |
| Plastic mini bundle wrap | USA | 0.00054 |
| Plastic Cap | USA | 0.0021 |
| Biogenic carbon content | kg C per m |
|---|---|
| Biogenic carbon content in product | 0 |
| Biogenic carbon content in accompanying packaging | 0.003 |
Hazardous substances
No regulated hazardous or dangerous substances are included in this product.
Scenarios
End of life (C1-C4)
- Collected separately
- 0.454 kg
- Collected with mixed construction waste
- 0.454 kg
- Recycling
- 0.431 kg
- Landfill
- 0.0227 kg
- Product or material for final disposal
- 0.0227 kg
Benefits and loads beyond the system boundary (D)
- Recycling rate of product
- 95%
- Recycled content of product
- 100%
Product description
RAC is a robust and corrosion-resistant conduit designed to protect electrical wiring in a variety of environments. Made from high-quality, recycled aluminum, this conduit offers excellent durability and is lighter than traditional steel alternatives, easing installation and handling. Penn’s RAC meets UL (UL 6A) and ANSI (C80.5) standards, ensuring safety and reliability for both commercial and industrial applications. It is available in standard trade sizes and is suitable for both indoor and outdoor use, with a design that facilitates secure connections with standard fittings. Additionally, the recyclable nature of aluminum makes it an environmentally friendly choice for sustainable construction practices.
Reference Standard: UL (UL 6A) and ANSI (C80.5)
Interpretation
The analysis of Penn aluminum conduit provides useful insights regarding the life cycle environmental impacts. The LCA results also identify where substantial impacts are occurring to allow further process and materials improvements to be implemented by Penn.
Both the raw materials module (A1) and the manufacturing module (A3) share a large contribution to almost all LCIA indicators, for both product types explored in this study. Penn's greatest opportunity for improving the environmental profile of their products is to focus on natural gas use during manufacturing. For example, decisions on a different fuel source to replace the energy used during manufacturing would reduce final impacts. The energy during melting relies heavily on fossil fuel consumption based on high demand during the melting process. The current production process uses natural gas which accounts for about 90 percent of the impact for the manufacturing module (A3). The impact from this energy demand can be reduced by integrating renewable energy alternatives instead of fossil fuels. There is evidence in the market from some aluminum manufacturers that hydropower is a viable replacement for fossil fuels successfully reducing energy impacts. There is also evidence of induction furnaces, solar power, and wind power for smelting of aluminum. Focusing on reducing this impact of this input would have the largest effect on total impacts.
The raw materials module (A1) also plays an important role in the indicator values. The aluminum used in the lifecycle includes impact from transforming recycled material into usable inputs for the system. Considering this material is recycled aluminum material, reduction of the impact for the process would come from energy intensity associated with transformation of the recycled material. Use of renewable sources of energy would allow for a less impact from these processes.
Module D represents a net credit, as the system produces more scrap material available for recycling at end-of-life than raw material used as input to the system. It is important to note that Module D is outside the system boundary of the cradle-to-grave assessment and should not be aggregated with the core life cycle results.
LCIA results are relative expressions and do not predict impacts on category endpoints, the exceeding of thresholds, safety margins or risks. EPDs are comparable only when they follow the same PCR, functional unit and system boundary. The full EPD (PDF) contains the methodology, scenario assumptions and verification statement.