Smart EPD
InsulPure FSK Faced Duct Wrap

Environmental Product Declaration

InsulPure FSK Faced Duct Wrap

by CertainTeed Saint-Gobain

Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) for InsulPure FSK Faced Duct Wrap, manufactured by CertainTeed Saint-Gobain. Declaration SmartEPD-2024-025-0135-01, prepared according to Part B: Building Envelope Thermal Insulation Products, valid until August 20, 2029.

Download the EPD (PDF)

Functional unit
1 m2 of material with RSI = 1m2K/W of product
Valid until
August 20, 2029
PCR
Part B: Building Envelope Thermal Insulation

Declaration details

Manufacturer
CertainTeed Saint-Gobain
Program operator
Smart EPD
Declaration number
SmartEPD-2024-025-0135-01
Date of issue
August 20, 2024
Valid until
August 20, 2029
Product category rules (PCR)
Part B: Building Envelope Thermal Insulation Products (version 3)
Standard
ISO 14025:2006 and ISO 21930:2017
Functional unit
1 m2 of material with RSI = 1m2K/W of product
System boundary
Cradle to gate with other options (A1 - A3, A4, A5, C1 - C4)
Product specificity
Product Specific
Manufacturing specificity
Facility Specific
Manufacturing plant
CertainTeed Interior Products Group (Athens, GA) (425 Athena Dr, Athens, GA 30601, USA)
Product category
ThermalMoistureProtection › Insulation › BlanketInsulation
Product service life
75 years
Verifier
Cher Xue, TrueNorth Collective
LCA software
LCA for Experts 10.7
Program instructions
Smart EPD General Program Instructions v.1.0, November 2022

Life cycle assessment results

Results per 1 m2 of material with RSI = 1m2K/W of product.

Environmental Impact Assessment Results

Unfaced Duct Wrap
IndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5C1C2C3C4
GWP-total [including biogenic carbon]kg CO2 eq1.16e+07.23e-24.46e-304.53e-406.17e-3
GWP-fossil [excluding biogenic carbon]kg CO2 eq1.09e+07.14e-22.82e-304.10e-406.04e-3
ODPkg CFC 11 eq2.24e-72.70e-121.55e-1401.55e-1402.96e-16
APkg SO2 eq1.35e-34.29e-41.83e-502.46e-603.20e-5
EPkg N eq8.51e-42.38e-55.78e-601.37e-701.40e-6
POCPkg O3 eq2.61e-21.18e-21.09e-406.78e-505.83e-4
ADP-fossilMJ2.22e+01.26e-11.03e-307.25e-401.21e-2

Resource Use Indicators

Unfaced Duct Wrap
IndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5C1C2C3C4
PEREMJ1.17e-102.84e-40001.13e-2
PERMMJ0000000
PERTMJ1.17e-102.84e-40001.13e-2
PENREMJ1.60e+19.19e-17.71e-305.28e-309.64e-2
PENRMMJ0000000
PENRTMJ1.60e+19.19e-17.71e-305.28e-309.64e-2
SMkg2.80e-1000000
RSFMJ0000000
NRSFMJ0000000
REMJ0000000
FWm3-1.33e-206.56e-70001.19e-5

Waste and Output Flow Indicators

Unfaced Duct Wrap
IndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5C1C2C3C4
HWDkg9.43e-1006.06e-140002.40e-12
NHWDkg3.87e-306.30e-30002.88e-1
CRUkg0000000
MFRkg0000000
MERkg0000000
EEEMJ, LHV0000000
EETMJ, LHV0000000
HLRWkg2.59e-703.00e-110001.19e-9
ILLRWkg2.15e-402.69e-80001.07e-6

Carbon Emissions and Removals

Unfaced Duct Wrap
IndicatorUnitA1-A3A4A5C1C2C3C4
BCRPkg CO20000000
BCEPkg CO20000000
BCRKkg CO2-1.23e-6000000
BCEKkg CO2001.23e-60000
BCEWkg CO20000000
CCEkg CO20000000
CCRkg CO20000000
CWNRkg CO20000000
BCCPAkg C0000000

ND = not declared. Life cycle modules: A1-A3 product stage, A4-A5 construction process, B use stage, C end of life, D benefits and loads beyond the system boundary.

Material composition

Product composition
Material/Component CategoryOrigin% Mass
SandUndisclosed10 - 15
LimestoneUndisclosed1 - 5
DolomiteUndisclosed1 - 5
CulletUndisclosed40 - 60
Recycled CulletUndisclosed15 - 25
BoraxUndisclosed5 - 15
Soda ashUndisclosed5 - 10
FeldsparUndisclosed10 - 15
Additional MaterialsUndisclosed0.1 - 1
BinderUndisclosed1 - 10
FSK FacingUndisclosed5 - 10
Packaging
Packaging materialOriginMass (kg)
Paper labelUndisclosed0.0000594
BagsUndisclosed0.0104
Woven SleevesUndisclosed0.0059
Biogenic carbon
Biogenic carbon contentkg C per m2 of material with RSI = 1m2K/W
Biogenic carbon content in product0
Biogenic carbon content in accompanying packaging0.00000368

Hazardous substances

No regulated hazardous or dangerous substances are included in this product.

Scenarios

Transport to the building site (A4)

Fuel type
Diesel
Vehicle type
Standard Freight Trailer
Transport distance
1740 km
Capacity utilization
85%
Weight of products transported
0.57 kg
Packaging mass
0.0164 kg

End of life (C1-C4)

Collected separately
0.00171 kg
Landfill
0.00171 kg
Product or material for final disposal
0.00171 kg

Product description

Product Identification

InsulPure FSK Faced Duct Wrap is an easy, cost-effective method to help conserve energy in residential and commercial new construction, remodeling and re-insulation projects. Fiberglass Building Insulation is intended for use in either residential or commercial construction as thermal and acoustical insulation in ceilings, walls and floors. InsulPure FSK Faced Duct Wrap is composed of white uniformly textured, inorganic fibrous glass and formed with a formaldehyde-free binding agent. InsulPure FSK Faced Duct Wrap is available Faced (FSK) or Unfaced.

Product Specification

• InsulPure FSK Faced Duct Wrap® brings you long-lasting comfort through thermal performance, reduced noise levels and exceeds California's strict Indoor Air Quality Requirements, all the while saving 12 times as much energy in its first year as the energy used to produce it. Plus, it will last for the life of the building as it won't settle, accumulate moisture or lose its R-value over time.

• Renewable. Recycled. Plant Based.

o CertainTeed InsulPure FSK Faced Duct Wrap is made of fiberglass that consists of rapidly renewable content, a high percentage of recycled glass, and a new plant-based binder that has no formaldehyde, harsh acrylics, dyes or unnecessary fire retardants added.

Interpretation

This study was conducted following appropriate ISO standards and best practices and is intended for internal use to assist CertainTeed with understanding the life cycle impacts of their products, as well as having the results published in an EPD. All data for the operation of the manufacturing facilities, as well as transportation distances and modes, was collected directly from CertainTeed. Efforts were made to check the data for internal consistency and to verify data with plant personnel. Sub-metering of energy use for each critical stage in the manufacturing process would allow for more detailed analysis and is recommended. The findings in this research are limited by the inherent uncertainty of creating a representative model through LCA. Many assumptions were made in the modeling of the product system with representative processes and datasets. While quality control was undertaken at each step in building the LCI and conducting the LCIA, uncertainty is present in the results since the data represents only one year of manufacturing information from manufacturing location. Detailed evaluation of more manufacturing plants and time periods would reduce the uncertainty. Some level of uncertainty is inherent in conducting LCA and decision making must reflect this fact.

Based on the results from the life cycle assessment, the life cycle impacts are strongly driven by the manufacturing process and the raw materials. In addition, when considering the impacts of the product with facing material added, the impacts of the facing are significant. Increasing energy efficiency would help to reduce the overall environmental impacts. Identifying alternate uses or recycling options for the product at the end of its useful life will reduce the end-of-life and potential raw materials burdens of recycled product. If possible, incorporating more recycled content into the product will help reduce the environmental impacts of the raw materials stage in the life cycle of the product. Borax and soda ash are the largest contributors to the raw material impacts for the products, responsible for over 50% of the environmental impact potentials in several categories. The citric acid is also a consistent contributor to the raw material environmental impact potentials, responsible for around 15% of the impacts depending on the category. Increasing the recycled content as mentioned above, will help decrease the usage of these larger contributors to the impacts.

LCIA results are relative expressions and do not predict impacts on category endpoints, the exceeding of thresholds, safety margins or risks. EPDs are comparable only when they follow the same PCR, functional unit and system boundary. The full EPD (PDF) contains the methodology, scenario assumptions and verification statement.