Smart EPD
Plyboo® RealCore® Carved Bamboo Plywood

Environmental Product Declaration

Plyboo® RealCore® Carved Bamboo Plywood

by Smith & Fong

Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) for Plyboo® RealCore® Carved Bamboo Plywood, manufactured by Smith & Fong. Declaration SmartEPD-2024-009-0130-01, prepared according to Smart EPD® Part A Product Category Rules for Building and Construction Products and Services, v1.01, valid until May 23, 2029.

Download the EPD (PDF)

Declared unit
1 kg of product
Valid until
May 23, 2029
PCR
Smart EPD Part A v1.01

Declaration details

Manufacturer
Smith & Fong
Program operator
Smart EPD
Declaration number
SmartEPD-2024-009-0130-01
Date of issue
May 23, 2024
Valid until
May 23, 2029
Product category rules (PCR)
Smart EPD® Part A Product Category Rules for Building and Construction Products and Services, v1.01 (version 1.01)
Standard
ISO 14025:2006 and ISO 21930:2017
Declared unit
1 kg of product
System boundary
Cradle to gate (A1 - A3)
Product specificity
Product Specific
Manufacturing specificity
Facility Specific
Manufacturing plants
China Facility (Zhejiang, China); California Facility (Indio, CA, USA)
Product category
Finishes › WallFinishes
Verifier
Anna Lasso, Smart EPD
LCA software
openLCA 1.11
Program instructions
Smart EPD General Program Instructions v.1.0, November 2022

Life cycle assessment results

Results per 1 kg of product.

Environmental Impact Assessment Results

IndicatorUnitA1-A3
GWP-totalkg CO2 eq1.05e+0
ODPkg CFC 11 eq1.92e-8
APkg SO2 eq7.17e-3
EPkg N eq2.20e-3
POCPkg O3 eq1.24e-1
ADP-fossilMJ9.48e-1
ODPkg CFC 11 eq1.25e-8
APkg SO2 eq6.65e-3
EPkg PO4 eq1.74e-3
POCPkg ethylene eq3.44e-3
ADP-fossilMJ1.26e+1

Resource Use Indicators

IndicatorUnitA1-A3
PEREMJ, net calorific value9.38e+0
PERMMJ, net calorific value8.15e+1
PERTMJ, net calorific value9.09e+1
PENREMJ, net calorific value1.01e+0
PENRMMJ, net calorific value0
PENRTMJ, net calorific value1.01e+0
SMkg0
RSFMJ, net calorific value0
NRSFMJ, net calorific value0
REMJ0
FWm39.99e+0

Waste and Output Flow Indicators

IndicatorUnitA1-A3
HWDkg0
NHWDkg0
RWDkg0
CRUkg0
MFRkg1.37e-1
MERkg0
EEEMJ0
EETMJ0

Carbon Emissions and Removals

IndicatorUnitA1-A3A5C3C4
BCRPkg CO2-1.26e+1000
BCEPkg CO28.40e+0001.83e+0
BCRKkg CO2-2.18e-2000
BCEKkg CO21.29e-32.05e-200
BCEWkg CO22.34e+0000
CCEkg CO20000
CCRkg CO20000
CWNRkg CO20000

ND = not declared. Life cycle modules: A1-A3 product stage, A4-A5 construction process, B use stage, C end of life, D benefits and loads beyond the system boundary.

Material composition

Product composition
Material/Component CategoryOrigin% Mass
Bamboo95
Adhesive5
Packaging
Packaging materialOriginMass (kg)
Corrugated Boardbox3.54E+01
Shrink Wrap1.81E-03
Wood Pallet1.17E+02
Particle Board1.15E+02
Medium Density Fiberboard5.69E-02
Metal Binding2.30E+00
Biogenic carbon
Biogenic carbon contentkg C per kg
Biogenic carbon content in product0
Biogenic carbon content in accompanying packaging0

Hazardous substances

No regulated hazardous or dangerous substances are included in this product.

Product description

Carved bamboo plywood (flat and edge grain) is a panel product made entirely from Moso bamboo. All panels are of a 3-ply construction having a face skin on top and bottom with a perpendicular core. On a typical ¾ (19mm) panel the face skins are approximately 3.5mm each and the core is 12mm.

Carved bamboo plywood panels can be used in a wide range of applications both commercial and residential. Applications include cabinetry and casework, furniture, store fixtures and displays, wall and ceiling panel systems, doors, and many other applications where plywood is typically utilized.

Interpretation

Results Summary

The results of the LCA indicate that the Module A1 (bamboo plywood entering the California, USA plant) is the largest contributor to the Smith & Fong product footprint across impact categories. The largest contributor to Module A1 is the electricity and steam generation taking place during the manufacturing of the bamboo plywood. The packaging used for the carved bamboo plywood is a significant contributor. Impacts of the packaging are driven by the use of particle board. Inbound transportation of the bamboo plywood to the plant is included and is a small contributor to the product footprint. The study timeframe is for the year 2022 for Smith & Fong manufacturing in California, USA.

This study does not include comparisons or benchmarking. Environmental declarations from different programs based upon different PCRs may not be comparable.

Forest management impacts

While this EPD does not address landscape level forest management impacts, potential impacts may be addressed through requirements put forth in regional regulatory frameworks, ASTM 7612-15 guidance, and ISO 21930 Section 7.2.11 including notes therein. These documents, combined with this EPD, may provide a more complete picture of environmental and social performance of wood products.

While this EPD does not address all forest management activities that influence forest carbon, wildlife habitat, endangered species, and soil and water quality, these potential impacts may be addressed through other mechanisms such as regulatory frameworks and/or forest certification systems which, combined with this EPD, will give a more complete picture of environmental and social performance of wood products.

EPDs can complement but cannot replace tools and certifications that are designed to address environmental impacts and/or set performance thresholds – e.g. Type 1 certifications, health assessments and declarations, etc. National or regional life cycle averaged data for raw material extraction does not distinguish between extraction practices at specific sites and can greatly affect the resulting impacts.

Accuracy of Results

EPDs regularly rely on estimations of impacts; the level of accuracy in estimation of effect differs for any particular product line and reported impact when averaging data. Variability was estimated in this EPD by mass allocation.

LCIA results are relative expressions and do not predict impacts on category endpoints, the exceeding of thresholds, safety margins or risks. EPDs are comparable only when they follow the same PCR, functional unit and system boundary. The full EPD (PDF) contains the methodology, scenario assumptions and verification statement.