Environmental Product Declaration
HP ScanJet Pro 3000 s4
by HP Inc.
Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) for HP ScanJet Pro 3000 s4, manufactured by HP Inc.. Declaration SmartEPD-2025-007-0396-01, prepared according to SuMPO Product Category Rule for Imaging Input and/or Output Equipment, valid until April 8, 2030.
- Functional unit
- 1 unit of product
- Valid until
- April 8, 2030
- PCR
- SuMPO Product Category Rule for Imaging Input and/or Output Equipment
Declaration details
- Manufacturer
- HP Inc.
- Program operator
- Smart EPD
- Declaration number
- SmartEPD-2025-007-0396-01
- Date of issue
- April 8, 2025
- Valid until
- April 8, 2030
- Product category rules (PCR)
- SuMPO Product Category Rule for Imaging Input and/or Output Equipment (version 08)
- Standard
- ISO 14025:2006
- Functional unit
- 1 unit of product
- System boundary
- Cradle to grave (A1 - A3, A4, B1, C2, C4)
- Product specificity
- Product Specific
- Manufacturing specificity
- Manufacturer Average
- Manufacturing plant
- Asia Manufacturing Operations (1150 Depot Road, Singapore 109673)
- Product SKU
- 6FW07A
- Product service life
- 5 years
- Verifier
- Juanita Barrera R
- LCA software
- GaBi 10.0
- Program instructions
- Smart EPD General Program Instructions v.1.0, November 2022
Life cycle assessment results
Results per 1 unit of product.
Environmental Impact Assessment Results
| Indicator | Unit | A1-A3 | A4 | B1 | C2 | C4 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GWP-total | kg CO2 eq | 4.00e+1 | 1.27e+0 | 2.16e+1 | 2.50e-2 | 4.68e+0 | 6.76e+1 |
| ODP | kg CFC-11 eq | 1.05e-5 | 2.65e-7 | 3.73e-6 | 6.30e-9 | 7.31e-8 | 1.46e-5 |
| AP | kg SO2 eq | 2.37e-1 | 8.38e-3 | 2.32e-2 | 1.47e-4 | 9.36e-4 | 2.70e-1 |
| EP-fw | kg P eq | 1.52e-4 | 7.83e-6 | 1.19e-5 | 7.75e-8 | 2.11e-5 | 1.93e-4 |
| ADP-minerals&metals | kg Cu eq | 1.06e+0 | 7.17e-4 | 1.32e-2 | 1.96e-5 | 1.76e-2 | 1.09e+0 |
| ADP-fossil | kg oil eq | 1.04e+1 | 3.19e-1 | 6.13e+0 | 5.96e-3 | 4.86e-2 | 1.69e+1 |
Resource Use Indicators
| Indicator | Unit | A1-A3 | A4 | B1 | C2 | C4 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FW | m3 | 2.46e-1 | 3.03e-3 | 1.30e-1 | 2.21e-5 | 1.43e-2 | 3.93e-1 |
ND = not declared. Life cycle modules: A1-A3 product stage, A4-A5 construction process, B use stage, C end of life, D benefits and loads beyond the system boundary.
Material composition
| Material/Component Category | Origin | % Mass |
|---|---|---|
| Metals | Asia | 18 |
| Plastics | Asia | 41 |
| Packaging (Corrugate, Wood & Plastics) | Asia | 23 |
| Glass (non-CRT) | Asia | 1 |
| EU WEEE Directive (Separate Annex II Materials) | Asia | 15 |
| Wires/Cables | Asia | 1 |
| Other Miscellaneous Materials | Asia | 1 |
| Biogenic carbon content | kg C per unit |
|---|---|
| Biogenic carbon content in product | 0 |
| Biogenic carbon content in accompanying packaging | 0 |
Hazardous substances
No regulated hazardous or dangerous substances are included in this product.
Product description
Color scanner
Interpretation
The model assumes a scanner lifetime of 5 years. The scanner is assumed to scan an average of 2.6E005 images per year, or 1E003 images per day (5 days/week). Power consumption figures are based on Energy Star testing of the scanner in each power mode, using this average job load. The end-of-life treatment for the scanner and mechanical consumables represents a best case for electronics recycling, i.e. separation of bulk parts, shredding, and incineration of electronics. (No credits are applied for materials or energy recovered at end of life, consistent with the recycled content, a.k.a. cut-off EoL allocation methodology.) As LCI models for uncontrolled recycling/disposal of products are not available, this case was not considered in this study. Following the cut-off end-of-life allocation approach, materials sent to recycling and energy recovered from incineration fall outside the system boundary. Only the impacts (and no credits) associated with the separation, shredding, waste treatment (incineration or landfilling) and transport steps are shown in the end-of-life results.
LCIA results are relative expressions and do not predict impacts on category endpoints, the exceeding of thresholds, safety margins or risks. EPDs are comparable only when they follow the same PCR, functional unit and system boundary. The full EPD (PDF) contains the methodology, scenario assumptions and verification statement.