Environmental Product Declaration
HP DesignJet Smart Tank T858 Printer / HP DesignJet Smart Tank T908 / T918 MFP
by HP Inc.
Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) for HP DesignJet Smart Tank T858 Printer / HP DesignJet Smart Tank T908 / T918 MFP, manufactured by HP Inc.. Declaration SmartEPD-2025-007-0328-01, prepared according to SuMPO Product Category Rule for Imaging Input and/or Output Equipment, valid until March 3, 2030.
- Functional unit
- 1 unit of product
- Valid until
- March 3, 2030
- PCR
- SuMPO Product Category Rule for Imaging Input and/or Output Equipment
Declaration details
- Manufacturer
- HP Inc.
- Program operator
- Smart EPD
- Declaration number
- SmartEPD-2025-007-0328-01
- Date of issue
- March 3, 2025
- Valid until
- March 3, 2030
- Product category rules (PCR)
- SuMPO Product Category Rule for Imaging Input and/or Output Equipment (version 08)
- Standard
- ISO 14025:2006
- Functional unit
- 1 unit of product
- System boundary
- Cradle to grave (A1 - A3, A4, B1, C2, C4)
- Product specificity
- Product Specific
- Manufacturing specificity
- Manufacturer Average
- Manufacturing plant
- Asia Manufacturing Operations (1150 Depot Road, Singapore 109673)
- Product SKU
- 2Y9H4A,2Y9H6A,2Y9H7A
- Product service life
- 5 years
- Verifier
- Juanita Barrera R
- LCA software
- GaBi 10.0
- Program instructions
- Smart EPD General Program Instructions v.1.0, November 2022
Life cycle assessment results
Results per 1 unit of product.
Environmental Impact Assessment Results
| Indicator | Unit | A1-A3 | A4 | B1 | C2 | C4 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GWP-total | kg CO2 eq | 3.61e+2 | 3.23e+1 | 1.09e+3 | 6.35e-1 | 2.87e+1 | 1.51e+3 |
| ODP | kg CFC 11 eq | 6.80e-5 | 6.72e-6 | 6.28e-5 | 1.60e-7 | 1.26e-6 | 1.39e-4 |
| AP | kg SO2 eq | 9.31e-1 | 2.12e-1 | 7.81e+0 | 3.72e-3 | 4.84e-2 | 9.01e+0 |
| EP | kg PO4 eq | 1.37e-3 | 1.98e-4 | 2.92e-1 | 1.97e-6 | 3.44e-3 | 2.97e-1 |
| ADP-minerals&metals | kg Copper (Cu) eq | 7.30e+0 | 2.50e-2 | 1.33e-1 | 9.16e-4 | 2.56e-1 | 7.71e+0 |
Resource Use Indicators
| Indicator | Unit | A1-A3 | A4 | B1 | C2 | C4 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FW | m3 | 1.54e+0 | 7.68e-2 | 9.97e+1 | 5.62e-4 | 1.24e-2 | 1.01e+2 |
ND = not declared. Life cycle modules: A1-A3 product stage, A4-A5 construction process, B use stage, C end of life, D benefits and loads beyond the system boundary.
Material composition
| Material/Component Category | Origin | % Mass |
|---|---|---|
| Metals | Asia | 40 |
| Plastics | Asia | 31 |
| Packaging (Corrugate, Wood & Plastics) | Asia | 29 |
| Glass (non-CRT) | Asia | <1 |
| EU WEEE Directive (Separate Annex II Materials) | Asia | <1 |
| Wires/Cables | Asia | <1 |
| Other Miscellaneous Materials | Asia | <1 |
| Biogenic carbon content | kg C per unit |
|---|---|
| Biogenic carbon content in product | 0 |
| Biogenic carbon content in accompanying packaging | 0 |
Hazardous substances
No regulated hazardous or dangerous substances are included in this product.
Product description
Large Format Printer
Interpretation
The model assumes a printer lifetime of five (5) years. The printer is assumed to print an average of 2.56E+4 images per year, or 98.6 images per day (five (5) days/week). This unit has built-in functionality for automatic duplexing. As such, a 25% reduction in paper use has been reflected. Power consumption figures are based on Energy Star testing of the printer in each power mode, using this average job load.
The LCA data for office paper is based on the uncoated freesheet paper developed by the American Forest & Paper Association, and models paper production, transportation, and end-of-life treatment. This paper dataset assumes that average office paper contains 4% recycled content and is recycled 72% of the time. A paper weight of 20 lb. (75 g/m2) is assumed when paper (rather than an alternative material) is the chosen printing media.
The end-of-life treatment for the printer and mechanical consumables represents a best case for electronics recycling, considering that the device enters the general electronics waste stream for US and modeled using end-of-life models for recycling, incineration and landfilling in the US, i.e. separation of bulk parts, shredding, and incineration of electronics. (No credits are applied for materials or energy recovered at end of life, consistent with the recycled content, a.k.a. cut-off EoL allocation methodology.) As LCI models for uncontrolled recycling/disposal of products are not available, this case was not considered in this study.
A default distance of 100 km by truck is set to account for the end-of-life transportation, from device use location to waste management facilities.
LCIA results are relative expressions and do not predict impacts on category endpoints, the exceeding of thresholds, safety margins or risks. EPDs are comparable only when they follow the same PCR, functional unit and system boundary. The full EPD (PDF) contains the methodology, scenario assumptions and verification statement.